Comments on: Interracial Sextuplets

By: Nephie

Nephie — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:02:19 +0000

Hey E!!! U do have a Hardworking Single Dad website…It’s called I Date White…and U get different kinds of donations…LOL…U’re too much! Keep up the ood work E!!

By: Eathan

Eathan — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:32:44 +0000

From what I’ve heard now..She is now getting death threats..and the police are having to provide protection for her. Another way for our tax dollars going to waste.. ughh. It frustrates me.

By: Eathan

Eathan — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:31:23 +0000

I’m am very shocked at how this woman is using the system. Something is really wrong.

By: Eathan

Eathan — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:30:18 +0000

I couldn’t agree with you more. There is a lack of responsibility all around this woman.

By: Cilla

Cilla — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:20:27 +0000

Jon and Kate are certainly more stable and handling parenthood more responsibly than Nadya Suleman. I think the biggest fault here, however, lies with the fertility doctors who implant large numbers of embryos during in vitro fertilization procedures. Trying to deal with Nadya Suleman’s situation now is the classic case of the horse is already out of the barn. Why wasn’t this regulated further upstream in the process? Why are physicians allowing patients to hedge their bets on fertility treatments and implanting eight embryos in hopes that one or two develop? It’s one thing to use artificial insemination and take the risk of multiple births that accompanies pre-insemination hormone treatments. It’s another thing altogether to know that you could be facilitating the birth of octuplets.

And what about a psych eval for Nadya Suleman prior to her in vitro treatment? What about social services? How did she afford those in vitro treatments in the first place? The medical establishment dropped the ball a couple of times with her, didn’t they?

By: Marina Hoffman

Marina Hoffman — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:13:17 +0000

Dee, I TOTALLY agree with you!
I am a school “clinic lady” and work with “special kids” every day, I sometimes find myself saying “thank goodness that’s not my child” and “THAT mom deserves a medal!”
I am also too aware that unless you fight tooth and nail, you won’t receive the services that your child needs and deserves. They SHOULD receive assistance so that they can benefit from private school which specialise in children with any learning or cognitive disability. Shame on her for cashing in on her kids because that, in my opinion, is what she is hoping for. If the media has any sence at all, they will stop at the 15 minutes of fame .

By: dee

dee — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:08:50 +0000

That her 3 children recieve ‘disability’ SSI is beyond me!! I can understand the first one who has autism. But the second has ADHD and the third had a ‘mild speech delay’. A mild speech delay and ADHD are cause for getting $700 per month EACH?!?!? My older son has ADHD and my younger had a pretty pronounced speech delay. I get NOTHING from the state for either one of them! The only thing I ever got was free speech therapy once my son turned 3 years old from the local school system. Until he turned 3 I was told I was on my own. If every kids that has ADHD or a ‘mild speech delay’ qualified as disabled and received SSI the system would soon be bankrupt. This is patently RIDICULOUS!